An over-saturated photo
depicts the definition
of my physical existence.
Although my face was rounder then.
Stamps
signify my passage
into foreign territories.
Visas
indicate a longer,
more deliberate stay.
Sometimes superfluous.
Sometimes absent altogether.
But it’s all symbolic anyway.
Crossing borders
through cities
of countries
and neighbors.
This little booklet is my proof,
my passport
to the world.
The pages of my life story.
As such,
it offends my orderly olfaction
when they carelessly stamp
out of sequence.
But I keep moving.
I keep moving because
if I stop
I start thinking.
Wondering.
How can lands belong to people?
How can people belong to lands?
And how come I don’t have
a passport to
my soul?
Liberal Hypocrisy
14 05 2009Ok, I just need to get something off my chest. This whole “Miss California” scandal angers me, but not for the reasons most of you would assume, coming from me.
If I had to choose between calling myself Liberal or Conservative, yes, I would say I am Liberal. But above all, I am RATIONAL and LOGICAL. As such, nothing angers me more than a hypocrite because a hypocrite is someone whose actions and/or words contradict each other—the antithesis of reason and logic.
It seems to have become vogue to associate conservatives with hypocrisy (or maybe that’s just because I live in a liberal social sphere?), but liberals can be just as hypocritical. And being that I associate myself with liberalism, it probably angers me more to see a liberal hypocrite than a conservative one; it undermines what liberals stand for.
As such, it really makes me mad that Liberal Media & Co. has crucified this Miss California woman FOR STATING HER OPINION! For the love of Darwin, do you not see the hypocrisy here?! No, I do not agree with her opinion. But it is her opinion. And if you listen to her response, she is fairly diplomatic about it. Here’s a link to the video of her response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMvviFbkf0
Now, I’m not saying it was the most intelligent of responses (“in my country…” xD), nor the most direct (she never specifically answered the question about whether or not other states should legalize gay marriage) but it was honest. She said that she was glad that Americans are able to choose one or the other but that she herself believes marriage should be between a man and a woman. This was actually quite bold, given that the question came from judge Perez Hilton, an openly gay man. She could have played it safer and given him the answer he wanted to hear, but instead she remained true to her beliefs.
Let me be clear: I do NOT agree with Miss California’s opinion; I think same-sex marriage should be legal throughout this country. I could come up with many arguments against her position and I could point out many inconsistencies in her beliefs (as further articulated in her recent press conference), but that is not my point here.
My message is to you, my fellow liberal friends: Please remember that freedom of speech is the cornerstone of liberal values. Do not censor your enemy; if you believe so strongly that they are wrong, then this should be apparent when they speak. And if so, present your counterargument and disprove your opponent. This is the only noble way to fight for your cause. Anything less will only work against you.
Comments : 4 Comments »
Tags: beliefs, Commentary, conservative, Darwin, debate, freedom of speech, hypocrisy, liberal, Logic, Miss California, opinions, Politics, reason, same-sex marriage, Socrates, values
Categories : Commentary, Peace, Politics, Religion, life, love, questions, thought